Flow Simulation is better suited to solving conjugate heat transfer problems.ĭid you know that before the 1960’s, the process to solve conduction, convection and radiation was to handle them separately? As you might expect, this was not an accurate approach to solving the real physical process. I’ve made a long-form video explaining all of these modes in more detail, see link at the bottom, so I will only summarize them here in the series.Ģ. The main 3 reasons why Flow Simulation is the better option will be outlined in a series of three parts.Īs noted above, there are three modes of heat transfer: conduction, convection and radiation. The most typical exceptions would be when: (1) there is no convective heat transfer mechanism in the problem that is being solved because likely the object(s) are in a vacuum and only transport heat through conduction and radiation or (2) the thermal solution does not require a great deal of accuracy reflecting a physical test perhaps in the very early design stages when estimates are sufficient. ![]() With the exception of very few scenarios, when considering a thermal analysis solver for SOLIDWORKS, you should choose to use Flow Simulation, which is a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code. ![]() For thermal heat transfer analysis, choose SOLIDWORKS Flow Simulation over the Thermal solver in Simulation Professional, Part 2 of 3 Conjugate Heat Transfer
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |